A consensus
does not mean
anything in
real science.
Real science does not
care about popularity
contests.
Throughout history,
a consensus usually
meant the science
would eventually
be proven wrong.
Scientific advances
usually come from
proving an existing
consensus was
wrong.
Meanwhile,
the popular term:
'"scientists say",
is nothing more
than an 'appeal
to authority'
logical fallacy.
And that appeal
to authority
is the primary
propaganda tool
of climate alarmists.
It's their version
of the conservative
appeal to authority:
"God says ... "
"Scientists say",
is often stretched to:
"97% of scientists say".
"97% of scientists say"
is often followed by:
"the science is settled".
"The science is settled"
implies the future
climate is known,
and no debate
will be tolerated.
Just shut up, and
do what the leftists
say, which will
always include
a huge ramp up of
government control
over your life.
That's something
leftists have alway wanted,
starting long before
climate change became
their favorite boogeyman.
Climate alarmists
don't know much
about real climate
science,
which studies
the PAST and
PRESENT
climate.
Climate alarmists
are obsessed with
wild guess, always
wrong, predictions of
the FUTURE climate,
which they are "sure"
can only be bad news.
Leftists are always
unhappy with the world,
especially if they get
what they want
( Cuba, Venezuela, U.S.S.R,
North Korea, etc. )
Leftists usually "see"
bad news in the future,
as if they could predict
the future.
Leftists always have
an environmental
boogeyman,
which they change
when it stops
scaring people:
-- DDT
-- Acid Rain
-- Hole in the Ozone Layer
-- Global Cooling
-- Global Warming
-- next boogeyman TBD
Leftists think scary,
and always wrong,
climate predictions
are real science.
In fact, wrong predictions
prove a theory is wrong,
except in climate change
junk science ... where a
1970's era CO2-global
warming theory remains
alive, like a climate change
zombie, even after 45 years
of wrong climate predictions.
( CO2 level up 100% = global average temperature
goes up +3 degrees C. )
If the 97% consensus myth
does not shut up skeptics
of a coming climate change
crisis, the leftists resort to
Saul Alinsky-style ridicule
and character attacks.
Perhaps looking down
at you, and asking if you
have a science PhD, and
have had peer reviewed
articles published in
scientific journals?
That appeal to authority
is a logical fallacy intended
to "prove" you are not
qualified to debate
their coming climate
change crisis fantasy.
And never mind the
ACTUAL global warming,
since the late 1600s,
of roughly
+2 degrees C.,
starting from an
unusually cold
period in the
late 1600s.
That global warming
has been
100% good news,
for about 325 years.
For leftists, PAST global
warming has nothing to do
with FUTURE global warming,
and don't you forget it !