Total Pageviews

Thursday, November 14, 2019

California's political environment makes PG&E their wildfire scapegoat

The Camp Fire 
killed 85 people.

It destroyed 
the town 
of Paradise,
California.

PG&E’s equipment 
reportedly caused 
this fire. 

PG&E had to 
declare bankruptcy.

A tree or branch 
that falls across 
power lines 
can cause 
sparking that 
can ignite a fire. 

An earthquake 
can result in 
power lines
touching 
each other 
creating a 
short circuit 
that can also 
cause sparking 
and ignite a fire.

"California’s Most 
Significant Droughts", 
published by the 
California Department 
of Water resources:
“California’s 
most significant 
historical droughts 
of state-wide scope 
were those with the 
longest duration or 
driest hydrology 
– the six-year drought 
of 1929-34, t
he two-year drought 
of 1976-77, and 
the six-year event 
of 1987-92.”

Recent droughts were in 
2007-09 and 2012-14. 

Paleontological 
data show 
California had 
severe droughts 
dating back a 
thousand years.

CO2 levels 
were constant
at 280 ppm.


What’s really changed 
is forest management.

California poses a risky 
environment which 
may require much
more aggressive 
maintenance 
procedures.

The  California 
government should 
have required 
more aggressive 
tree trimming 
and clearing 
requirements.

Higher electric rates 
would cover 
the added costs.

The recent trend
is fewer wildfires, 
but each fire
 is more severe.

The most likely cause
is an increase in dead trees 
and underbrush from 
a government policy 
of leaving forests natural.

Meaning the California 
government was most 
responsible for the 
increase in large wildfires.



When an energized 
wire touches ground 
or is short circuited, 
such as when two 
energized wires cross, 
it will create an arc 
or spark. 

When an electric 
arc or spark touches 
flammable material, 
it can ignite that material.

The less moisture in the
flammable materials 
the more likely they 
will ignite.

Dead trees, 
perhaps killed by 
insect infestations, 
and dead brush 
are especially 
dangerous.

California’s rules for 
trimming and clearance 
often required clearance 
of only four feet. 

Ten feet here
in southeastern 
Michigan,
which is 
less windy 
than California.

PG&E wanted to 
increase clearance around 
its power lines to 15 feet 
on each side of the pole 
or transmission tower, 
the Sierra Club objected.


Quoting the Sierra Club:
“‘The California Public Utilities
 Commission requires PG&E 
maintain at least a 4-foot clearance 
between vegetation and power lines 
in high fire-threat areas year-round 
to help ensure electric reliability 
and public safety.’ 

Under their new program, 
PG&E wants to enlist 
property owner consent 
to voluntarily remove 
all vegetation to a distance 
of 15 feet from each side 
of the power lines in the 
affected zones, and extend 
the clearing down to 
one foot above the ground.”

And:
“With the planned 
clearcut width of 30 feet, 
the path of destruction 
[from clearing] 
could be considerable.


California's 
political 
environment 
prevented P&E 
from doing 
the right thing.



PG&E is 
the scapegoat.