Total Pageviews

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Ten Years Later: 2009's ClimateGate revealed that climate change “experts” are not trustworthy -- they are even worse now

The claim that 
the future climate 
can be predicted, 
because CO2 is 
the "climate 
control knob", 
is unproven 
speculation.

That claim, 
along with 
the claim that 
the future climate 
must be 
bad news, 
are both 
science 
fraud.

That's the 
FIRST scandal
of government 
climate
"science" ... 
the lack of real 
science.

Government 
climate "science"
consists of 
repeated, 
always wrong, 
wild guesses 
'of the
future climate,
stated with 
high confidence ! 



Ten years ago, 
ClimateGate was 
the SECOND 
scandal 
in the history of
government 
climate "science". 

The mainstream media lies
by claiming ClimateGate
was fake news, invented 
by "climate deniers".

ClimateGate is hacked 
eMails proving there was
consistent dishonesty 
among government 
scientists, at the 
Climatic Research 
Unit (CRU) at Britain’s 
University of East Anglia.

They colluded 
to destroy or
"adjust" away
any inconvenient 
data, evaded
Freedom of 
Information Act 
inquiries, and 
generally bullied 
all dissenters.

They tried to rewrite 
climate history, to erase 
the widely recognized 
Medieval Warming Period.



ClimateGate did not 
offer proof that the 
man-made climate scare 
is completely fabricated. 

It did 
prove bias, 
and false 
confidence, 
was used 
to create 
the narrative
presented 
to the public.

Typical bias:
Phil Jones, 
Director of the 
Climatic Research Unit, 
emailed on 
September 6, 2007, 
that the dangerous 
+2-degree C.
global warming limit was 
“plucked out of thin air”, 
a throwaway line 
in an early 1990s 
paper from the 
catastrophists at the 
Potsdam Climate 
Impacts Institute.

For the coders and 
computer programmers, 
the "Harry Read Me" files 
exposed dishonesty 
of the gatekeepers 
of the climatic datasets.



Science is 
supposed to work 
by one person 
making a claim, 
and backing it up 
with data.

Other scientists
then attack the claim, 
and try to replicate 
the first scientist’s work. 

If they can’t replicate it,
then it has failed.



Blocking the Freedom of 
Information Act Requests
allowed Phil Jones
to claim his temperature
record (HadCRUT3) 
was valid science.

ClimateGate 
showed that 
keeping people 
who disagree 
with you 
from checking 
your work, 
and seeing 
if your math 
is correct, 
was very 
important to 
government 
climate 
"science".



ClimateGate 
revealed 
that climate 
change 
“experts” 
are not 
trustworthy. 

Unfortunately,
ten years later, 
no one has 
been punished, 
or even reprimanded,
as a result 
of the hacked
ClimateGate 
e-Mails

The world’s biggest 
science fraud 
-- the false claim
that the future climate
can be predicted --
unfortunately, has
survived ClimateGate.