Real Science is very different
from Junk Science,
where it is claimed
the future climate can be
where it is claimed
the future climate can be
predicted, then predictions
are made, and they have been
grossly inaccurate
since the 1970s,
are made, and they have been
grossly inaccurate
since the 1970s,
but no one cares
about the many decades
of wrong predictions !
about the many decades
of wrong predictions !
Real science has a lot of mysteries,
where scientists do not have answers.
Such as exactly what causes climate
change on our planet.
There's a good explanation
for the 100,000 year cycles --
90,000 year glaciations and
10,000 year interglacials.
That good explanation
is changes in planetary geometry
that affects incoming sunlight.
There are no useful explanations
for the mild +/- 1 or 2 degree C.
changes over 100 to 500 years.
One example is the
intermittent global warming,
of at least +2 degrees C.,
since the 1690s.
Some scientists claim the
1690s were cold because of
unusually low solar activity,
as proven by an unusually
long period of low sunspot
counts, called the Maunder
Minimum.
That explanation is a decent
one for why the 1690s were
the coldest decade of many
relatively cool centuries,
now called the Little Ice Age,
from roughly 1350 to 1750.
But there were four sunspot
minimums during the Little Ice
Age, and not one of them
displayed a temperature pattern
we should expect to have
during a sunspot "minimum"
with low solar activity
(the temperature gradually gets
cooler, until solar activity starts
increasing).
So we have
yet another mystery
about the climate !
Speaking about mysteries,
I've written about "The Blob"
here before.
This is not the first
time there was a
Pacific Ocean "Blob".
The main point
of the next article
is that unusual
weather events are
surprisingly common.
When real scientists
examine real events,
the result is often that
they just scratch
their heads, and can't
explain them.
At the same time, "fake
scientists" claim that
carbon dioxide, the staff
of life on this planet,
is actually an evil gas.
While greenhouse owners
enrich their inside air
with CO2, and thousands
of studies praise the many
benefits of CO2 enrichment
on plant growth !
I summarize a few CO2
enrichment plant studies
here every month, including
one today.
The CO2 level on our planet
is unusually low -- the optimum
CO2 level for plants that are
used for food by humans
and animals, is double
to triple the current CO2 level.
Real science
tells us MORE CO2
in the atmosphere
will support more life
on our planet.
How could that
possibly be
bad news ?
And there is absolutely
no evidence that adding
CO2 to the atmosphere
has caused any bad news,
EXCEPT when fossil fuels
are burned WITHOUT modern
pollution controls, polluting
the air people have to breathe.
Harmful real pollution
happens to be visible,
may irritate our eyes,
or we may smell it
or we may smell it
-- beneficial CO2
happens to be invisible.
Although "perfesser"
Greta "thundering" Thunberg
claimes she can see CO2 !
happens to be invisible.
Although "perfesser"
Greta "thundering" Thunberg
claimes she can see CO2 !
Many things that happen
on our planet are mysteries
( including the false demonization
of the staff of life -- CO2 ! )
I have no explanation for the
strange weather events,
in the next article,
except to say
except to say
there's a lot to be learned
about what has ALREADY
HAPPENED on our planet
... so there is no reason
to waste time making
always wrong predictions
about the FUTURE climate !
End of rant !