Total Pageviews

Saturday, December 14, 2019

The ridiculous international "war" over the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline







Russian gas giant Gazprom 
was due to finish production 
on three major pipeline projects
this month:
-- Nord Stream 2, 
-- Turkstream and 
-- Power of Siberia

Power of Siberia is finished. 

The Turkstream pipeline 
should open next month.






Nord Stream 2 
is behind schedule, 
mainly because 
of pressure from 
the United States.








Opposition 
to Nord Stream 2 
in the US is 
all about leveraging 
influence in Ukraine, 
to turn it into 
a client state, 
hostile to Russia, 
sharing a border 
with Russia. 

If there’s no gas transit 
contract, and there’s no 
Nord Stream 2, then US
LNG suppliers can sell gas 
there, and deprive Russia 
of the revenues.


Also:
Russia's Gazprom 
and Ukraine’s Naftogaz 
are two natural gas 
companies locked in 
legal disputes for years.

Most disputes are over 
costs incurred during 
the previous (and expiring) 
gas transit contract.

Ukraine has sued Gazprom 
in courts, such as Sweden, 
that rule not by contract law, 
but through the lens 
of social justice.


Naftogaz seized 
Gazprom’s European assets, 
escalating the conflict.

These policies were pursued 
by former Ukrainian President, 
and US State Department 
asset Petro Poroshenko.


The EU had a choice:
Stay with the US, 
or green light 
Nord Stream 2. 

Not being friendly
with President Trump,
the EU changed its
gas pipeline rules to force 
Gazprom to ‘unbundle’ 
the pipeline from the gas 
flowing through it.

Then EU chose 
that Nord Stream 2 
should be finished -- 
In October, Denmark 
granted the final
environmental permit
for its construction.

That delay moves 
the completion date 
out into 2020. 


Meanwhile, US Senate Foreign 
Relations Committee head, 
Jim Risch, wants anyone 
assisting Gazprom to build
the pipeline to be sanctioned 
and forced out of business.

But so little of the pipeline
is left to complete, that there's
no practical way to stop it .

Risch and other US senators 
hoped to strand Nord Stream 2 
as an unfinished boondoggle.

That won't happen.

The German government 
wants the pipeline, and
needs the pipeline, so will 
put up the funds to ensure 
the contractors are paid 
and the pipeline completed.

Once completed,
the United States
will have no ability
to sanction the gas 
flowing through 
the pipeline.

Serbia Hungary, Bulgaria
Italy and Greece currently 
get their natural gas
from Ukraine.

That's a potential risk
if nothing gets resolved
between Ukraine and 
Russia, currently at war.

The US foreign policy 
establishment uses Europe 
as the battleground 
in the war against Russia. 

That's why natural gas 
storage facilities in Europe 
are kept full.

Europeans are tired of 
all the fighting.

Wednesday's 2020 
National Defense 
Authorization Act 
           (NDAA)
included long-threatened 
sanctions on Russia's 
Nord Stream 2 
underwater natural 
gas pipeline. 

The House bill
targets companies 
assembling the pipeline, 
a last ditch US effort 
to block the 760-mile 
project that would allow 
Russia to export natural 
gas directly to Germany, 
depriving Ukraine of 
badly needed gas 
transit fees along 
the current route 
for Russian supplies.


The $10.5 billion 
Nord Stream 2, 
runs parallel to the 
existing Nord Stream 
pipeline.

It has been supported by
Gazprom and five European 
energy companies.

It's expected to double 
Russian gas shipments 
to Germany, the EU's 
biggest economy.

Washington fears 
it will give Moscow 
significant geopolitical 
leverage over Europe, 
while also punishing 
Ukraine.


Trump has charged 
Germany with giving 
"billions" of dollars 
to Russia. 

Earlier this year 
a France-led effort 
in the European Union 
attempted to halt 
the project, but was
not successful.

Berlin is charging 
Washington with 
"interference" 
and meddling 
in European 
energy policy.

German Foreign Minister 
Heiko Maas, told Bloomberg: 

“European energy policy 
must be decided in Europe, 
not the U.S.” ... 

“We fundamentally reject 
outside intervention 
and sanctions with 
extraterritorial effect.”