Total Pageviews

Thursday, April 9, 2020

Radical U.K. plan to "decarbonize" transportation obscured by COVID-19 epidemic

The official paper 
was released 
on March 26, 
a day when 
daily U.K. 
COVID-19 
deaths reached 
578, for the  
worst day
up to that point.


The government 
bureaucrat authors 
were probably 
very happy that
their paper got 
little attention.

First of all, the paper
confirmed the U.K., 
now out of the EU, 
would still adhere to 
the EU’s strict CO2 
emissions standards.

For cars, 
EU standards 
are the toughest
in the world.



A U.K. transportation 
decarbonization plan 
was due November 2020,
to coincide with the UN’s 
annual climate-change 
conference, COP-26, 
in Glasgow.

That conference, 
however, was 
recently delayed 
to 2021, thanks to 
COVID-19.

The Department
for Transport's ( DfT ) 
paper, on the future 
of UK transport, 
calls for a major shift 
out of cars into cycling, 
walking and buses, and 
"using cars differently 
in the future".

"From motorcycles to HGVs, 
all road vehicles will be 
zero emission," ... 
"and technological 
advances … will change 
the way vehicles are used."

The transport secretary, 
Grant Shapps, claims:
"we will use our cars less 
and be able to rely on a 
convenient, cost-effective 
and coherent public transport 
network."

Convenient public transport ?

That might work in London,
but not in the rest of the U.K., 
where public transportation 
is usually sub-standard.

Personal cars and trucks 
had previously opened 
up many distant employment 
opportunities for people 
who live outside of cities.


"Tailpipe emissions 
for new cars and vans 
remains a crucial lever," 
says the paper, 
which says the U.K. 
will at least match 
the EU’s CO2 targets, 
with manufacturers 
facing fines for 
non-compliance.

The paper says
U.K. cars produce 
about 20% lower 
greenhouse-gas 
emissions 
than in 1990 ... 
but that was offset 
by a 22% increase 
in traffic.

And fuel efficiency gains 
have stalled in recent years.

The paper blames 
the increasing popularity
of SUVs, which usually use 
more fuel than cars.

The paper fails to mention 
the public also lost interest 
in buying CO2-efficient 
diesel-fueled cars.


How will a reduction 
in private vehicles
be achieved ?

The paper 
does not answer
that question.

Will private vehicles 
have to be taxed, 
making them 
too expensive 
for ordinary 
people ? 

Will private vehicles 
have to be rationed, 
perhaps one per family ?