Total Pageviews

Monday, May 11, 2020

“An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National Security” -- looking back at the 2003 report

The mass media loves 
scary climate predictions.

They publish them 
without questions
and make their
headlines even scarier
than the predictions.

The media do not like 
looking back to analyze
the old predictions
they have published.

But I do ! 

Governments around the world 
spent 2018 and 2019
declaring a Climate Emergency. 

Then the COVID-19 pandemic 
showed us what a real crisis 
looks like. 



The climate emergency
is still "coming" -- in ten 
years, say the latest
computer models !

The so called models
have been saying 
the same thing 
since the 1970's,
and some 
scientists were 
saying the same thing,
without computers,
since the late 1950s.

If the models 
were accurate,
the predictions 
would have 
come true 
by now.



In 2003, the US
Department of Defense 
commissioned a report 
on the risks climate change 
“An Abrupt Climate Change 
Scenario and Its Implications 
for United States National 
Security”. 

It was submitted to the Pentagon 
in October 2003, when then
President George W. Bush 
was getting international criticism 
for his indifference to the global 
warming issue.

The contents of the report 
were leaked in early 2004. 

By two British publications, 
the Guardian newspaper, 
and its Sunday sister 
The Observer.

“Pentagon tells Bush: 
Climate Change 
Will Destroy Us” 
the headline said. 

“Climate change 
over the next 
20 years 
could result in a 
global catastrophe, 
costing millions 
of lives in wars 
and natural disasters.”

Climate scientists 
hailed the report.

German climatologist 
John Schellnhuber 
that the Pentagon report 
should be a “tipping point” 
in persuading Bush to stop 
being a climate denier, 
whatever that means.

Schellnhuber later become 
head of Germany’s top 
climate research institute 
and the top climate advisor 
to the supposedly conservative 
Christian Democratic Union 
Chancellor Angela Merkel.

British climate expert 
Robert Watson said: 
“It’s going to be hard 
to blow off this sort 
of document. … 
The Pentagon 
is no wacko, 
liberal group
… If climate change 
is a threat to 
national security 
and the economy, 
then he has to act.”

At the time, Watson was 
the chief scientist 
for the World Bank 
and the former chair 
of the Intergovernmental 
Panel on Climate Change.

Another former 
chair of the IPCC, 
Sir John Houghton, 
added “If the Pentagon 
is sending out that sort 
of message, then this 
is an important 
document indeed.”

The Guardian quoted 
a former senior 
Environmental 
Protection 
Agency official 
who said 
the report was 
“yet another example 
of why this government 
should stop burying 
its head in the sand 
on this issue.” 



The "top" scientists 
at the time agreed 
with the 2003 predictions, 
mainly for things 
that would happen by 2020, 
unless the US and others 
took drastic actions 
( which never happened ).



Prediction A:
Coastal levees in the 
Netherlands could be 
so damaged by storms 
by 2007 that they
 would give way, 
making Dutch cities 
like the Hague unlivable.

That did not happen.

In 2019 there was a big 
Climate Change and Security 
Conference in the Hague, 
and it was not underwater !



Prediction B:
There would also be 
a failure of delta levees 
in the Sacramento region 
of California that 
would cause an 
inland sea to form 
in the Central Valley.

That did not happen.

Today there is 
no sign of 
an inland sea 
covering the 
California 
Central Valley. 



Prediction C:
Starting in 2010, 
ocean circulation patterns 
would break down, 
wiping out the Gulf Stream
and causing European 
temperatures to plunge 
about 3 degrees 
in 10 years. 

By 2020, according to 
the report, Europe’s climate 
would be like Siberia’s.

That did not happen.



Prediction D:
Europe would 
experience 
a drought for 
the entire decade 
from 2010 to 2020, 
as would China 
and East Africa. 

That did not happen.



Prediction E:
The US and Europe 
would enter into 
open conflict over 
fishing rights 
starting in 2016.

That did not happen
 -- no fish war.



Prediction F:
Border skirmishes 
would start among 
European countries 
over dwindling food 
and water. 

That did not happen
 -- no dwindling food 
or water.



Prediction G:
The European Union 
will nearly collapse by 2025, 
as 10% of the population 
fled for North Africa 
and Israel.

The opposite happened. 

The EU took in a huge wave 
of migrants from North Africa 
and the Middle East.



The predictions 
were approved by 
top experts 
at the Pentagon, 
endorsed by leading 
climate scientists, 
and then touted 
in the media as 
definitive evidence 
with major policy 
implications.

In fact, to use 
a technical term, 
the report was a huge pile 
of steaming farm animal 
digestive waste products !

In the spring of 2020 
we found out what 
a real emergency 
looks like
-- COVID-19. 

Nothing like 
an imaginary 
“climate 
emergency".