Total Pageviews

Sunday, June 21, 2020

FDA bans Hydroxycholoquine use while doctors all over the world have good results

The U.S. FDA banned
Hydroxycholoquine 
use for COVID-19
even as doctors all over 
the world have had
good results with that
cheap generic drug.

Especially when HCQ
is combined with zinc.

The FDA rescinded 
its emergency use 
authorization (EUA) 
of hydroxychloroquine 
               (HCQ)
to treat COVID-19 patients, 
citing concerns about 
efficacy and risks 
associated with its use.


The U.S. 
government
failed to do 
field studies
of physicians
treating Covid-19 
patients in Europe, 
or even in the U.S.

The following 
percentages
of doctors 
reported use 
of HCQ+AZ
(AZ = antibiotic and zinc): 
72% in Spain, 
49% in Italy, 
41% in Brazil, 
39% in Mexico, 
28% in France, 
23% in the US, 
17% in Germany, 
16% in Canada, 
13% in the UK



Harvey Risch 
is a Professor 
of Epidemiology 
at the Yale School 
of Public Health. 

He compares the
top two treatments 
in the USA --
the anti-malarial 
drug HCQ, and 
the anti-Ebola 
drug Remdesivir.

In a 29 page review 
he concludes that 
with the US reopening, 
and 10,000 people 
dying each week, 
they don’t have time 
to wait for 
randomized 
controlled trials.

Patients need a drug 
that can reduce the rate 
of hospitalization, 
and there is already 
enough data to warrant 
the use of HCQ + AZ
(Azithromycin and Zinc).

Remdesivir is 
a newer drug 
with mainly 
lab and animal 
research. 

HCQ is an 
old, cheap drug 
with very low and 
well-known risks. 

It’s being used 
for malaria in many 
poorer countries 
all over the world, 
and many doctors 
on the frontline 
are convinced 
that it helps
with COVID-19.



There are five trials 
on the ClinicalTrials.gov
database for HCQ and AZ
in the outpatient setting.

One French study 
shows an amazing
50 fold benefit 
when started early, 
and only (!) 
a 25 fold benefit 
when waiting until 
the virus has progressed 
to the lower respiratory 
tract.

There was a seven-fold 
benefit from taking AZ
at the same time.

The first study 
of HCQ+AZ 
was controlled, 
but not randomized 
or blinded, and 
involved 42 patients 
in Marseilles, France. 

Six patients progressed, 
stopped medication use, 
and left the trial before 
the day-6 planned outcome
measure of swab sampled 
nasopharyngeal viral 
clearance. 

Including those 
six patients 
does not 
much change 
the 50-fold 
benefit. 

When the symptoms 
progressed to a lower 
respiratory-tract infection,
the benefit was 25-fold.

The average start date 
of medication use 
in this study was 
day-4 of symptoms. 

The 25-fold or 
50-fold benefit 
found in this study 
is very unlikely 
to be caused only
by a non-random 
selection of patients.

The study showed a 
7-fold benefit of taking 
HCQ+AZ over taking
HCQ alone.

The study has been 
described as “small,” 
but that criticism 
only applies to studies 
not finding such a huge
statistical significance.




A second study 
of the Marseilles group 
involved 1,061 patients 
who tested positive
for SARS-CoV-2,
treated with HCQ+AZ 
for at least 3 days, 
and followed 
for at least 9 days. 

The authors state 
“No cardiac toxicity 
was observed.” 

Good clinical outcomes
and virological cures
were seen in 973 patients 
(92%). 

Five patients died, 
and the remainder 
were in various stages 
of recovery.




In Brazil, 412 patients
were treated with HCQ 
plus deoxycycline 
(a different antibiotic). 

Those treated 
before day seven 
had about one third 
the chance of ending up 
in a hospital, as those 
who started treatment 
later. 

Adding zinc to 
the combination 
cut mortality 
in half again:



HCQ+AZ has been 
a standard-of-care 
treatment at 
the four New 
York University 
hospitals, where 
a recent study
showed adding 
zinc sulfate 
to this regimen 
significantly cut 
both intubation and 
mortality risks
by almost half.



The FDA FAERS 
database contains 
1,064 adverse events 
for HCQ, including 
200 deaths, but that's 
low, because it covers
over 50 years of use, 
and involves millions 
of patients. 

Many of those patients 
were not using HCQ 
for five days 
(as Covid patients are)
 -- they were using it 
for months on end.


REFERENCE:
Risch, H. (2020)  
American Journal of Epidemiology, 
kwaa093,