Total Pageviews

Sunday, August 16, 2020

The IPCC Used To Admit How Difficult Climate Prediction Was -- Here Are Their Words

In the Honest 
Global Warming 
Chart Blog format:

"14.2.2 
Predictability in 
a Chaotic System"

The climate system 
is particularly challenging 
since it is known that 
components in the system 
are inherently chaotic;
there are feedbacks 
that could potentially 
switch sign, 
and there are 
central processes 
that affect the system 
in a complicated, 
non-linear manner. 

These complex, chaotic, 
non-linear dynamics 
are an inherent aspect 
of the climate system. 

As the 
IPCC WGI Second 
Assessment Report 
(IPCC, 1996) 
(hereafter SAR) 
has previously 
noted, 
“future unexpected, 
large and rapid climate 
system changes 
(as have occurred 
in the past) are, 
by their nature, 
difficult to predict. 

This implies that 
future climate
changes may also 
involve ‘surprises’. 

In particular, 
these arise from 
the non-linear, 
chaotic nature 
of the climate 
system 

... Progress 
can be made 
by investigating 
non-linear 
processes and 
sub-components 
of the climatic system.” 

These thoughts 
are expanded 
upon in this report: 
“Reducing uncertainty 
in climate projections 
also requires a better 
understanding of these 
non-linear processes 
which give rise 
to thresholds 
that are present 
in the climate system. 

Observations, 
palaeoclimatic data, 
and models suggest 
that such thresholds 
exist and that transitions 
have occurred in the past
 ... Comprehensive 
climate models 
in conjunction 
with sustained 
observational systems, 
both in situ and remote, 
are the only tool to decide 
whether the evolving 
climate system 
is approaching 
such thresholds. 

Our knowledge 
about the processes, 
and 
feedback mechanisms 
determining them, 
must be 
significantly improved
in order to extract 
early signs 
of such changes 
from model simulations 
and observations.” 
(See Chapter 7, Section 7.7).



14.2.2.1 
Initialization and 
flux adjustments

" ... Models,
 by definition, are 
reduced  descriptions 
of reality 
and hence incomplete 
and with error. 

Missing pieces 
and small errors 
can pose difficulties 
when models 
of sub-systems 
such as the ocean 
and the atmosphere 
are coupled. 

As noted in Chapter 8, 
Section 8.4.2, 
at the time of the SAR 
most coupled models 
had difficulty 
in reproducing 
a stable climate with 
current atmospheric 
concentrations of 
greenhouse gases, 
and therefore 
non-physical 
“flux adjustment terms” 
were added. "


This sounds like 
what I have known
since the late 1990s
-- the climate models
are all fluxed up !