Total Pageviews

Tuesday, March 9, 2021

"A SHORT HISTORY OF CLIMATE ALARM" by Paul Homewood

Source:

" ... Mankind has always seemed to be fascinated by promises of  apocalypse  and  global  catastrophe. 

... 1970s Ice Age scare
Numerous reports in the 1970s reflected concern that the Earth was
heading towards a new ice age.

These are nowadays often dismissed as mere newspaper gossip, but they were far more than that.


Some  scientists  forecast  a  full  ice  age,  for  instance  NASA’s  Dr. Rasool, who said that air pollution would cause a drop in temperatures  of  six  degrees.

Such  predictions  were  of  the  more  extreme  variety, but there was widespread acceptance amongst climate scientists that global temperatures had fallen sharply since the 1940s, and that this trend was likely to continue.

The US government was so concerned about events that it set up a Subcommittee on Climate Change in 1974, in turn leading to the US Climate Program in the same year and the subsequent formation  of  the  Climate  Analysis  Center,  designed  to  monitor  and  predict  climate  change.  

This  was  the  predecessor  to  today’s  NCEI,  the  National  Centers  for  Environmental  Information  run  by  the  US  Department of Commerce.

Needless  to  say,  the  cooling  trend  ended  soon  after  the  subcommittee was set up, and warming resumed.

... In the 1980s, the cooling trend reversed, and it did not take long for forecasts  of  apocalypse  to  re-emerge,  but  this  time  based  on  the idea of a hothouse planet.

In 1989, Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the UN Environment Program did not hold back, warning us that entire  nations  could  be  wiped  off  the  face  of  the  Earth  by  rising sea levels if the global warming trend was not reversed by the year 2000; coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees’; sea levels would rise by up to three feet; coastal  regions  would  be  inundated  –  one-sixth  of  Bangladesh  could  be  flooded,  displacing  a  quarter  of  its  90  million people, and a fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would
be flooded, cutting off its food supply;

it  would  cost  the  United  States  at  least  $100  billion  to  protect its east coast alone; shifting  climate  patterns  would  bring  back  the  Dust  Bowl  conditions of the 1930s to Canadian and US wheat lands.

The most conservative scientific estimate was that the Earth’s temperature would rise from 1 to 7 degrees over the following 30 years.

Well,  the  year  2000  came  and  went,  emissions  of  greenhouse gases carried on climbing, and global temperatures rose by a modest 0.4°C.

... Noel  Brown  gave  us  until  2000  to  save  the  planet. 

Australian  Chief  Scientist,  Penny Sackett,  was  more  optimistic. 


... she warned  us  we  had  an  extra  five  years  to  save  the  world  from  disastrous  global  warming.

Three  years  earlier,  in  2006,  Al  Gore  was  much  more  specific,  threatening  that,  unless  drastic  measures were taken to reduce greenhouse gases within ten years, the world would reach a point of no return.

 When the world ignored Al  Gore’s  warning,  the  UN’s  Christiana  Figueres  gave us  another  three years’ breathing space, but that deadline unfortunately ran
out too, just five months ago.

... The world has not ended as predicted, despite the fact that emissions of carbon dioxide have continued to grow rapidly year on year.

It is noteworthy that none of these predictions of doom came with any scientific basis attached.

On the contrary, the official reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)  invariably shy away from making such predictions. ...

 

Summary
These examples are just the tip of the 
iceberg. 
 
There are literally hundreds of scare stories, from deaf fish and giant oysters, weaker winds, stronger winds, obesity and UFOs. 
 
All things that would be caused or made worse by climate change. 
 
... While some are the work of cranks, far too many come from supposedly reputable sources, and are of course lapped up by the media, who are always desperate for headlines. 
 
Part of the problem may be the colossal amounts of money available for any research that can claim to be climate
related, no matter how tenuous the link. 
 
It is difficult not to conclude that many of the studies on which these claims are made would never have got off the ground otherwise.
 
... nobody seems to be held to account when their predictions
of doom don’t materialise. 
 
Meanwhile we are still inundated with similarly absurd assertions. 

... All of this has had a damaging effect on the standing of climatology as a whole. 
 
While ridiculous claims were being made by some scientists, where were their peers, who should have been standing up challenging them? 
 
And where were the scientists, when the media, politicians and Extinction Rebellion were declaring ‘climate emergencies‘ and worse?
 
It is hard not to conclude that the importance of getting a political message across was more important than scientific integrity. "