Computer game climate forecasts are not science -- they are inaccurate climate
astrology.
PS:
And here's what the Wall Street Journal said about
Obama's recent climate "deal" with China in a November 12, 2014
editorial:
"Under the nonbinding, no-detail agreement, Supreme Leader Xi
Jinping (of China) promises “to intend to achieve the peaking of CO2 emissions
around 2030,” and then maybe after that to decline. This is another way of
describing the status quo."
"Forecasts from the US Energy Information Administration, BP's Statistical
Review of World Energy and the academic journal Energy Policy all expect
Chinese energy consumption to crest in two decades due to demographic and
urbanization trends. Mr. Obama has in essence persuaded the Chinese to do what
they planned to do anyway."
"In return for Mr. Xi’s assurances, Mr. Obama pledged that the US
will cut emissions by as much as 28% below 2005 levels by 2025. This implies
doubling the annual pace of CO2 reductions over the 17% marker that Mr. Obama
set in 2009. So using the Sino-American deal as cover, Mr. Obama will now say
he is obliged to impose a new burst of aggressive carbon regulations, no matter
the harm to US growth."
"Meaningless global warming promises are much easier than
corralling weapons of mass destruction in North Korea, or convincing Beijing to
fight Islamic State, or for that matter stopping Chinese cyber-attacks on US
military and corporate targets. Mr. Xi must have been delighted to see a US
President agree to make America less economically competitive in return for
rhetorical bows to doing something someday about climate change."