Modern climate "science" -- Where's the science ?

The first thing I thought 

of in 1997, when I began

reading about global warming is:

 Where's the science? 

Modern climate "science"

is led mainly by left-wing 

politicians and activists, 

which made me very 
suspicious!

The politicians are supported

by many government bureaucrats

with science degrees.

Some of the bureaucrats 
have PhD's,

but their modern 

climate "science" 

is Piled high and Deep 
science!

Climate cult claims

resemble a religion, 

not real science.

The climate change cult 

character attacks skeptics

as "science deniers", 

because they fear debate.

They fear debate
because they can't debate 
the climate science

behind their long term 

wild guess predictions

of the future climate:

 Reason: Their wild guess 

climate predictions, 
that have been wrong
for the past 30 years,

are not real science !

There is very little 

real science to debate,

so debates are avoided

by attacking skeptics

with ridicule and character

attacks, Saul Alinsky-style.

The only real science is

infrared spectroscopy
lab experiments 
that show CO2 acts 
as a greenhouse gas

in a closed system.

From that bit 

of real science, 

comes a series of 

climate assumptions,

that start off 

sounding reasonable,

but quickly change to

unproven speculations.

(1)

The first in a series of

climate assumptions,

is that more CO2 

in the atmosphere

will cause some amount 

of global warming.

That's an unproven assumption,

but also a reasonable assumption

if you honestly admit that

the amount of warming 
is unknown.

Greenhouse gas warming 

should most affect the 

cold, high latitudes:

And the Arctic is warming,

but Antarctica is not.

If you look at Antarctica in detail,
                    ( see next article )

there are small areas at the edges

of the ice sheets that have melting,

but that local melting is from

ocean heat, from nearby
underseas volcanoes!

Unfortunately, 
the primary claim

in modern climate "science",

is that the future climate 

is well "known"

( called  "settled science" ),

when it is not known,

not even for one year

into the future!

That false claim explains

why modern climate "science"

is junk science, used mainly

by leftist politicians

to scare people 
into giving them

more power over corporate

and private energy use, 

and allowing new taxes 
on energy use.

(2)

A second assumption

is piled on top of

that first assumption:

Warming from a doubling 

of CO2 levels will trigger a 

positive feedback from

more water vapor in the air,

which will triple the warming 

from CO2 alone.

(3)

The third assumption

is piled on top of

the second assumption:

  

The combination of 

more CO2 in the air,

and more water vapor,

will increase the average

temperature of Earth by

       +3 degrees C.

              +/- 1.5 degrees C.

which we have been told,

without even one revision,

believe it or not, since 1979, 

with absolutely no evidence

the assumption is true.

Conclusions by 

climate researchers, 

blaming humans 

       (anthropogenic)

for climate change 

are derived from 

circular reasoning. 

Circular reasoning 

is a logical fallacy 

where researchers 

assume they know 

the conclusion before

their experiment starts.

When researchers think

they "know" the answers, 

they don't study 
all the possible causes

of climate change

-- they only seek data

they can use 
to blame humans.

  ( this results from confirmation bias ).

In fact,

the UN IPCC's "mission"
is to prove that humans 
cause climate change,
so their mission statement
suffers from confirmation bias !

Scientists use complex

computer climate models

to predict the future 

average temperature.

Well, we have 30 years 

of scary climate model

predictions of warming 

that have turned out to be 

triple the actual warming.

When climate predictions

are so far from reality,

in real science that means

the assumptions that were

used to build the models,

especially (2) and (3),

are obviously wrong.

But not in modern 

climate "science",

where wrong predictions 

DO  NOT  MATTER.

And the 1979 guess of

+3 degrees C. warming

from a doubling of CO2,

plus the water vapor effect,

NEVER  CHANGES,

even though 
climate model predictions

would be close to reality

if the models assumed
 +1 degrees C. warming

from a doubling of CO2,

and no water vapor

positive feedback.

But we can't have 

a +1 degree C. warming
per CO2 doubling assumption,

because that assumption

means CO2 is harmless,

because it would take 

133 to 200 years 

for a mere +1 degree C. 

of global warming !

A recurring pattern 

of circular reasoning 

is to focus on 

one specific period,

from 1975 to 2003, 

when there was 

lots of global warming 

and rising CO2 levels too.

Of course there is no proof

CO2 caused the warming,

but in modern climate "science",

strong correlation of A and B

is good enough to claim 

A causes B !

-- Never mind 

that in real science,

correlation is not 

causation ! 

-- And never mind 

the global cooling trend,

as CO2 levels rose,

from 1940 to 1975.

In modern climate "science",

contradictory data 

DO  NOT  MATTER !

-- And never mind 

the lack of warming,

as CO2 levels rose a lot,

from 2003 through mid-2015.

In modern climate "science",

contradictory data 

DO  NOT  MATTER !

The hypothesis 

of global warming 

from man made CO2 
is "proven" 

with 1975 to 2003 data 

-- meaning the other 
4.5 billion years

of Earth's climate history

DO  NOT  MATTER !

Anthropogenic (man made )

acceleration of sea level rise:

would be the principal danger 

from global warming.

Sea level rise is claimed

to be accelerating 

due to CO2-caused

melting glaciers

and ice sheets,
but tide gages 
don't show that.

Paleo records show

that both temperature 

and sea level have been 

in rising trends,
from ice melting 

in the past 20,000 years,

starting at peak glaciation.

Man made CO2 ws obviously

NOT the cause of almost all

of the 400 foot sea level rise

in the past 20,000 years !

Modern climate "science"

claims to be saving humanity 

from itself, allowing the 

"global warmunists",

to constantly virtue signal 

that they are good people !

Warmunists even have the nerve 

to claim the world must act now,

and do everything they say,

even if their science is wrong

                 (what science?).

The warminists also

seem to be actively
participating in

a 'story telling contest'

to see who can write, 

and get published,

the most scary article

about the damage that will

allegedly be caused

by burning fossil fuels.

The articles are fairy tales,

with wild speculation, even 

when written by a person

with a science degree. 

Any claim can be made,
with the knowledge that
fellow leftists will never challenge

the claims in the articles, 
so anything goes !

I'm waiting for a new article 

claiming that man's 'favorite organ'

is shrinking from climate change!

That ought to scare people,

at least half of them!

I got tired of climate fairy tales

a few years ago, and started

this ad-free blog in response,

as a public service.

I still read a climate fairy tale

once in a while -- they are 

more bizarre than ever --

but I prefer to focus on

criticizing the lack 

of real science behind  

the climate change cult.

Modern climate "science"

is junk science.

It is supported mainly

by politicians and

government bureaucrats

with science degrees,

all of them doing a great job

of wasting taxpayers' dollars !

There is no danger from adding 

2 or 3 parts per million of CO2

to the air every year, 
and many known benefits,

based on real science experiments

-- thousands of experiments ! --

showing more CO2 in the air 

accelerates green plant growth, 

and 'greens' our planet, which is

easily measured with satellites !

Adding CO2 to the atmosphere,

from fossil fuels burned cleanly,

is very beneficial for our planet.

Burning fossil fuels in a way that

pollutes the air, as in China,

is harmful for our planet,

but the climate change cult

doesn't care about real pollution

of air, water and land in China

... and India ... and other parts

of Asia !