On August 19,
I showed a New York
Times headline:
"How Much Hotter Is Your
Hometown Since When You
Were Born ?"
The article
cut off data
before 1960.
For people
born in the U.S.,
doing this hid
the hot 1930's:
The Times provided
an explanation for why
they rejected global
surface temperature data
from before 1960:
Because data before 1950
are not global ( they didn't
mention how few Southern
Hemisphere measurements
were included in the alleged
"global average" before 1950 ):
Could the New York Times
really be so concerned
about data quality?
Of course not.
The New York Times
is a newspaper for liars,
losers and leftists!
The newspaper that
gave its readers 3 years
of claiming candidate
and president Trump
colluded with Russians,
with no evidence at all.
That's the real NY Times !
While is is fair to exclude
some temperature data
compiled before 1960,
it is dishonest to exclude
United States temperature
data before 1960, simply
because you want to hide
the "inconvenient" 1930s.
The U.S. had the most
hot days per year
in the 1930's --
that's the only reason
the sleazy NY Times
deliberately blocked
U.S. data before 1960.
But were there enough U.S.
surface weather stations
back in the 1930's
for full coverage
of our nation?
Yes there were.
In fact, the current count
of U.S. weather stations is
the LOWEST in 100 years !
