Total Pageviews

Sunday, January 7, 2018

Glyphosate (Roundup) found safe yet again

On December 8, 2017,
I published an article:
"The Fake Science 
demonizing 
Roundup herbicide"

Ten days later the EPA
once again confirmed
that I was right.

Of course I had read their
similar "Obama EPA" report
from 2016, so I already
knew the answer !

A revised Obama-era EPA report 
(the new Trump version did not
change the conclusion),
was released 
December 18, 2017, 
and only included 
a few more studies 
that don’t alter the 
2016 "Obama EPA"
conclusions.

On September 12, 2016, 
the EPA had issued
the first version
of their glyphosate report,
at the link below: 


On December 18, 2017, 
the US Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) 
issued a paper titled: 
“Revised Glyphosate Issue Paper: 
Evaluation of Carcinogenic Potential” 
as part of a larger release 
of its latest findings
on glyphosate
the main active ingredient 
in the world’s most used, 
and safe, weed killer, 
Monsanto’s Roundup.

The reaction of the American press 
on the 2017 EPA report 
was almost complete silence. 

When 300 million pounds 
of glyphosate 
are used each year 
in the US, 
one has to be sure 
of its safety. 

From the glyphosate.eu website:
“Glyphosate has undergone 
more thorough toxicological testing 
than almost any other active
substance used in pesticides. 

As part of the latest risk assessment, 
the European Food Safety 
Authority (EFSA) and the 
German Federal Institute 
for Risk Assessment (BfR) 
evaluated more than 3,000 studies. 

They found no indications 
of nerve damage 
or of carcinogenic 
or mutagenic properties. 

Nor is glyphosate associated 
with reproductive toxicity.


The public had been concerned, 
among other things, 
by a classification of glyphosate
 as a “probable carcinogen” 
(category 2A) by the IARC, 
the WHO’s cancer research agency. 

However, the IARC 
does not look at actual risks 
to consumers, but at 
theoretical considerations. 

It does not consider 
how the assessed substances 
are handled, or look at 
actual exposure to them 
in everyday life. 

This explains why the same body 
has classified sausages and sawdust 
as “carcinogens” (category 1A).